3.54.
That was Senegal’s xG, against 1.8 for Belgium, a gap of 1.74 and the real shape of the night. The obvious take will point at the score and nod sagely, as if football were a tidy little board game where the player with more pieces always wins by move 90. It was not that sort of evening. The shot count sat level at 19 each, shots on target were 5 apiece, and possession barely leaned either way at 52 % to 48 %. Yet Senegal kept finding the more valuable squares, scoring at 25' through H. Diarra and again at 51' through I. Sarr, which should have given them command rather than merely a lead.
Still, there is an objection worth hearing: if Belgium were truly second best, why did they finish top of Group G on 5 points and reach the Round of 32 while Senegal ended third on 3? Why did this match follow the previous meeting so exactly, another 3 - 2? Why did Belgium earn 4 corners to 2 and block 5 shots to 3? Those details matter because they describe a side that never lost its place on the board even while chasing it. They also committed 22 fouls, which is one way of admitting you dislike the current arrangement and would prefer to reset it by hand.
The argument still stands because late drama does not erase earlier control; it only punishes waste. Belgium’s conversion rate was 1.67, Senegal’s 0.56, and that is the whole trick without any need for incense around “experience” or other after-dinner words. Romelu Lukaku pulled one back at 86', Youri Tielemans made it 89', then won it from the spot at 120+5'. Both keepers made 3 saves and both posted -0.61 goals prevented, so this was not a tale of one man in gloves performing miracles; it was a match where one side authored more danger and the other wrote the final move in cleaner ink. Belgium took first place, yes, but Senegal left with the stronger game and none of its reward.