NBAEXPOSEDMay 7, 2026

Spurs Nuke Wolves 133–95: 29-Pt Fast-Break Blitz Resets West Semis

The goaltend noise was the loudest sound in the building — but the real collapse happened at the rim. San Antonio triggered a 38-point demolition at a 123.7 ORtg. The Wolves answered with a limp 85.1 ORtg — structural breakdown, not variance.

Evidence

Key numbers

88/ 100 impact

Final Score

SAS 133 – MIN 95

WCSF Game 2, Frost Bank Center, Wed May 6 2026

True Shooting %

SAS 63.6% vs MIN 46.7%

+16.9 efficiency gap — structural dominance

Fast-Break Points

SAS 29 vs MIN 5

+24 transition gap — largest factor in margin

Paint Points

SAS 58 vs MIN 36

+22 rim domination; SAS at-rim FG% 62.5%

Wembanyama Line

19 pts / 15 reb / 2 blk / TS% 58.2%

Double-double, +12 net, 3 second-chance buckets

Castle Line

21 pts / TS% 75.2% / 9/9 FT

6 pts off turnovers, +17 net

Edwards Collapse

12 pts on 43.2 TS% / -33 net / 4 TO

1/5 from three; 0 free throws attempted on 2 blocked attempts

Gobert Meltdown

ORtg 60.1 / FT 3/9 (33.3%) / -23 net

5 pts on 4 attempts — eliminated rim-protection dividend

MIN Turnovers

22 total — SAS scored 19 pts off them

Randle 5 TO, Hyland -17 net; possession collapse

Game 3 Win Probability

Bravsen model: SAS 60.6% / MIN 39.4%

Basis: 3PT vol, Gobert FT, TS% gap, home-court -4.5

Analysis

SAS TS% 63.6 vs MIN 46.7. Fast break: SAS 29, MIN 5. Paint: SAS 58, MIN 36. Wembanyama: 19 pts, 15 reb, 2 blk. Castle: 21 pts, 75.2 TS%. Edwards: -33, 43.2 TS%. Gobert ORtg 60.1, FT 3/9. MIN 22 turnovers — SAS converted 19 pts off them.

The Fallout

What changed

Victim

MIN 85.1 ORtg, 22 TO, Gobert 60.1 ORtg.

Beneficiary

SAS series 1-1 with home-court edge, bench 55 pts.

Bracket

Game 3 at MIN — Bravsen model SAS 60.6% (3PT volume, Gobert FT profile, TS% gap, home-court -4.5 adjustment).

⚡ Next Trigger

Game 3 Sat May 9 at Target Center — Bravsen model: SAS 60.6% win probability