The numbers backed the 2:0 scoreline, and that is usually bad news for anyone hoping to find a conspiracy. Mexico finished with 1.02 xG against Ecuador’s 0.73, a modest but clear edge, and the match landed at a Crime Index of 45%. Nothing exotic here: the better side did enough, then left the scene tidy.
Ecuador controlled possession at 57% and completed more passes, 340 from 407 compared with Mexico’s 249 from 319. Useful for circulation, less useful for punishment. Mexico produced 15 shots to Ecuador’s 7, hit the target 3 times to 1, and took 10 efforts from inside the box against 5. The conversion rate told the same story with unnecessary bluntness: 1.96 for Mexico, 0.00 for Ecuador.
Ecuador did collect 8 corners while Mexico had 3, and both goalkeepers recorded just 1 save. Even so, the match never drifted far from its statistical script. Mexico blocked 3 shots to Ecuador’s 1, committed fewer fouls at 10 to 14, and avoided cards entirely while Ecuador picked up 3 yellow cards and a red.
This was dominance in its low-key form: not overwhelming, just sufficient and properly applied. Mexico needed fewer passes and less possession to create the better chances and convert them into a result that matched the underlying numbers. A very ordinary case by detective standards — efficient work, minimal noise, file closed.