Eredivisie Expected Goals Rankings

The expected-goals table: xG — chances created, xGA — chances conceded, "G−xG" — finishing (positive means scoring above the chances created, negative means wasting them). Built from played matches with xG data. New to xG? Read our guide.

#TeamPGoalsxGxGAG−xG
1PSV Eindhoven415:511.972.72+3.03
2Feyenoord410:611.343.84-1.34
3AZ Alkmaar413:311.344.04+1.66
4Groningen49:107.318.58+1.69
5NEC Nijmegen38:46.894.87+1.11
6GO Ahead Eagles411:96.697.69+4.31
7Sparta Rotterdam47:75.858.02+1.15
8Ajax38:25.673.08+2.33
9Twente37:35.601.54+1.40
10Utrecht46:155.328.25+0.68
11Excelsior37:34.843.88+2.16
12Cambuur44:164.779.03-0.77
13Willem II34:104.596.69-0.59
14PEC Zwolle44:84.106.42-0.10
15Telstar33:83.996.16-0.99
16Heerenveen45:63.866.28+1.14
17Fortuna Sittard48:73.6810.65+4.32
18ADO Den Haag44:113.209.27+0.80

Anomaly breakdowns for Eredivisie are on the competition page; all match reviews live in the archive.

The Eredivisie xG table ranks 18 teams. Feyenoord lead the table for total xG created, with 3.53 across 1 match.

Feyenoord set the total xG mark

The 3.53 total is the highest xG created among the 18 teams. Feyenoord therefore occupy the leading position in this measure after 1 match. Their total-xG lead and their performance-versus-xG figure tell different parts of the table: Feyenoord have the worst overperformance versus xG, at -2.53.

GO Ahead Eagles lead overperformance

GO Ahead Eagles hold the best overperformance versus xG at +1.65. This is the strongest figure in the table for that measure, while Feyenoord's -2.53 is the lowest. The two leaders are therefore distinct: Feyenoord are highest for total xG created, and GO Ahead Eagles are best for overperformance versus xG. The ranking can be read through these two reported xG measures rather than treating one as a substitute for the other. With 18 teams ranked, the table places both figures alongside the same Eredivisie team set.