Senegal — Iraq 5:0: One Box Entry All Evening
Final score: Senegal 5:0 Iraq — the match was played on 26 June 2026, Toronto.
01 Match Stats
What is xG? →// MATCH STATISTICS: Senegal — Iraq
02 Key Facts
What is Crime Index? →Key Facts
Senegal vs Iraq — 5:0 (FIFA World Cup). The win is backed by expected goals: xG 3.10 — 0.18. Match Crime Index — 52%: a moderate gap between the numbers and the result.
04 Breakdown
Five unanswered goals are not always a tale of superiority; sometimes they are a tale of superiority converted without a shred of mercy. Senegal dismantled Iraq 5:0 on the back of xG 3.10 — the finishing outran the forecast, but the model does not dispute the direction: a 52% anomaly score keeps the result within the borders of the deserved.
Twenty-Eight Attempts, Twelve On Target
Senegal's attacking volume belongs to a different weight class: 28 efforts, 17 of them from inside the penalty area. A dozen on target meant that even a great goalkeeping night from the opponent could only postpone the inevitable, never cancel it.
Beneath the flood sat control: 69% possession and 590 passes. With 518 of them accurate, the ball moved so surely that 12 corners feel less like a separate weapon than the natural by-product of permanent pressure.
The geography of the finishing adds nuance: 11 attempts from outside the box — even Senegal's excess had excess. Five host efforts were blocked, but against a conveyor like this, blocks solved only local problems: the next wave arrived immediately.
Seven Saves From Iraq's Keeper — Five Conceded Anyway
The one player on the losing side beyond reproach is the goalkeeper: 7 saves against a dozen shots on target. He kept out more than half of everything aimed at his frame and still picked the ball out of his net five times. A blunt judgment is fair here: without that shift between the posts, the score risked drifting into indecency, because the defence in front of him won practically no duels of anticipation. The contrast at the other end completes the picture: Senegal's goalkeeper was called into action once in ninety minutes — 1 save, and a routine one at that.
A Red Card And 184 Accurate Passes
Iraq's attack existed in name only: 6 attempts, just 1 of them from inside the box. An xG of 0.18 is not even failure — it is absence. The passing collapsed too: of 265 attempts, only 184 arrived, and at that level of connection the mere act of escaping one's own half becomes a lottery.
The red card was the final punctuation of resistance: ten men against 69% possession do not defend, they run down the clock. Two yellow cards alongside it testify that fouling had become the only available tool of containment. Notably, the match never turned dirty: 11 fouls for Iraq against 10 for the hosts is near parity. The visitors' problem was not aggression but the void between their penalty area and the ball — no press, no passing, no plan. Five of Iraq's 6 attempts flew in from outside the box, and 3 corners remained the sharpest thing that happened near Senegal's goal.
Why 5:0 Is About Method, Not Fortune
The most telling gap is the one between xG 3.10 and five goals. It looks like an excess of luck, but with 28 attempts the tails of the distribution start working for the shooter: the more quality entries you make, the more often the "extra" goals arrive. Senegal did not stumble into a hot night — it manufactured the conditions in which hot nights become statistically probable. For opponents deeper in the bracket, that is more alarming than any single scoreline. One offside all evening from 28 attempts is the closing proof of this attack's maturity: Senegal never ran blind, it entered the zones methodically and shot from where teams with large ambitions shoot.