The main finding is blunt: France were better in volume, quality, and territory, and the 3:0 score did not exaggerate a thing. Their xG reached 3.17 against Sweden’s 0.65, the gap stood at 2.52, and the anomaly label was plain enough — dominance, not deception.
Norway won the xG case by 0.38 and lost the scoreboard by three goals, which is usually where the numbers stop looking like sport and start looking like a forged alibi.