AlgeriaAlgeria
xG 1.62
3 : 3
AustraliaAustralia
xG 1.44

Algeria — Australia 3:3: Six Goals, Two Saves All Night

Case opened:
Updated:
⏱ Reading time: ~4 min
📅 Match date:
Bravsen Intelligence

Final score: Algeria 3:3 Australia — the match was played on 28 June 2026, Kansas City.

01 Match Stats

What is xG? →

// MATCH STATISTICS: AlgeriaAustralia

CRIME INDEX61%
Algeria
xG 1.62
3:3
Australia
xG 1.44
1.62Δ 0.18 xG gap1.44
65%
Ball Possession
35%
12
Total Shots
10
5
Shots on Target
3
5
Shots off Target
6
2
Blocked Shots
1
0
Goalkeeper Saves
2
0
Corner Kicks
3
3
Fouls
7
1
Offsides
3
0
Yellow Cards
1
755
Total Passes
397
706
Accurate Passes
346
LUCK FACTOR
×1.85
Algeria
vs
×2.08
Australia

Key Facts

Algeria vs Australia — 3:3 (FIFA World Cup). Match xG: 1.62 vs 1.44. Match Crime Index — 61%: a significant statistical anomaly — the scoreline contradicts the underlying numbers.

04 Breakdown

Six goals from a combined xG of 3.06 — an evening when both teams' finishing ran ahead of what they created. Algeria and Australia shared a 3:3 draw, and the 61% anomaly score calls it a mid-grade divergence: not a scandal, not the norm either. The strangest thing about the match is not the score — it is what the score was made of.

How Australia Turned Three Shots On Target Into Three Goals

The visitors played in maximum-economy mode: 35% possession, 397 passes — and 10 attempts all night. Three hit the target and all three ended in the net: one hundred percent conversion of accurate shots, leaving the opposing goalkeeper without any work at all — zero saves for Algeria across ninety minutes.

An xG of 1.44 says those chances were real rather than lucky: 6 of the 10 attempts were born inside the box. Add 3 offsides — this team ran in behind the hosts' high line systematically, and that route kept proving the shortest path to goal.

Australia's 3 corners are modest, but still more than the hosts managed. The visitors assembled their chances from whatever came to hand: 4 long-range efforts, set pieces, loose balls — with that little of the ball, pickiness is a luxury nobody can afford.

Algeria's 755 Passes: Control Without The Last Word

The hosts played a different sport: 65% possession and 755 passes, 706 of them accurate — a level of connection few sides at this tournament have shown. Out of that ocean grew 12 attempts and an xG of 1.62 — more than Australia's, but nowhere near proportional to the advantage in the ball.

One detail explains a lot: zero corners for Algeria. A team that owned two-thirds of the ball never once earned a corner — because it entered the box along the ground, finely, without bombardment. Elegant, but that kind of entry demands jeweller's precision, and the precision stretched to 5 shots on target and three goals.

The hosts' finishing geography came out flat: 6 attempts from inside the box, 6 from outside it. For a team with that much of the ball it is a strange ratio — half the shots from distance means the ground entry into the box worked less often than designed. Australian defenders blocked just 2 shots: Algeria's attack was not running into a stockade, it simply was not always reaching the spot from which teams score for certain.

A Match Without Dirt: Three Algerian Fouls

3 fouls for Algeria is a friendly-match number; Australia's 7 is barely more. Nothing resembling a game-breaking challenge, and a single yellow card between both teams. The match ran ninety minutes almost without interruption, and that served both attacks: with no pauses, defences never reset and the tempo never cooled.

What deserves attention is how that changes the price of every mistake: in a game without fouls and nearly without set pieces, goals are born in open flow, where the first defensive inaccuracy decides. Six times, it did. Algeria's single offside of the evening is another stylistic brushstroke: the hosts never ran in behind, they built positional storeys. Australia and its three offsides played the opposite game — and both philosophies ended up delivering three goals apiece.

Why 3:3 Is The Fairest Of Strange Scorelines

Both sides overshot their xG: Algeria scored three from 1.62, Australia three from 1.44. The symmetry is almost mirror-perfect, which is why the result leaves no one wronged: each team got more than it created — and conceded exactly as much extra in return. For the group arithmetic, this draw is a puzzle with an asterisk: it rewards both attacks and bills both defences at once. Whatever these two play next promises goals — and little else.

What the match report leaves out

The side with more of the ball was Algeria (65% to 35%) — control of possession that didn't automatically translate into control of the scoreboard. Algeria completed 755 passes at 93.5% accuracy, Australia 397 at 87.2%; raw pass volume alone doesn't correlate with chance quality in this game.

Fouls read 3-7 (Algeria-Australia) — the side committing fewer of them generally gave up fewer dead-ball situations to defend. Offsides: 1 for Algeria, 3 for Australia — a rough marker of how often either attack tried to time runs in behind.

Algeria won 0 corners to Australia's 3; inside the box it was 6-6 in shot attempts, generally a better read on chance quality than the 6-4 split from distance.

Blocked shots: 2 for Algeria, 1 for Australia — attempts that never reached the frame thanks to bodies in the way inside the box.

The full match report for Algeria vs Australia is available through the tournament's official statistics; the numbers above are its key parts.