JapanJapan
xG 1.21
1 : 1
SwedenSweden
xG 0.64

Japan — Sweden 1:1: Twenty Fouls Cut The Game Apart

Case opened:
Updated:
⏱ Reading time: ~3 min
📅 Match date:
Bravsen Intelligence

Final score: Japan 1:1 Sweden — the match was played on 25 June 2026, Arlington.

01 Match Stats

What is xG? →

// MATCH STATISTICS: JapanSweden

CRIME INDEX50%
Japan
xG 1.21
1:1
Sweden
xG 0.64
1.21Δ 0.57 xG gap0.64
52%
Ball Possession
48%
8
Total Shots
11
3
Shots on Target
5
3
Shots off Target
3
2
Blocked Shots
3
4
Goalkeeper Saves
2
2
Corner Kicks
8
20
Fouls
11
3
Offsides
2
1
Yellow Cards
2
445
Total Passes
395
378
Accurate Passes
312
LUCK FACTOR
×0.83
Japan
vs
×1.56
Sweden

Key Facts

Japan vs Sweden — 1:1 (FIFA World Cup). Match xG: 1.21 vs 0.64. Match Crime Index — 50%: a moderate gap between the numbers and the result.

04 Breakdown

Japan and Sweden drew 1:1 at AT&T Stadium in Arlington on 25 June 2026, and the Crime Index landed on a perfect 50% — the model's way of shrugging. Both teams left something on the table, just different things: Japan left goals, Sweden left almost nothing because it had almost nothing to leave.

A 1:1 draw from xG 1.21 vs 0.64: two kinds of shortfall

Japan generated 1.21 xG from just 8 attempts — an efficient chance-creation night — and cashed exactly one goal, a conversion of 0.83. Sweden inverted the formula: 11 attempts worth only 0.64, converted at 1.56. One side under-finished good chances, the other over-finished poor ones, and the scoreboard split the difference.

Possession ran 52% to 48 for Japan, with the passing counts nearly as tight: 445 to 395 attempted, 378 to 312 completed. Nothing structural separated these teams; the match was a sequence of episodes rather than a siege.

Japan's 20 fouls: the loudest number on the sheet

Here is the oddity worth pausing on: the team with more of the ball committed 20 fouls, nearly double Sweden's 11. That inversion — controlling possession while also leading the foul count — usually signals a side breaking play deliberately every time transition threatened.

The referee's cards stayed in his pocket by comparison: 1 yellow for Japan, 2 for Sweden. Twenty small, tactical interruptions chopped the game into fragments, and neither team ever got the sustained spell that turns pressure into a winner. For a match this even, the rhythm-killing mattered as much as any chance.

Eight corners to 2: Sweden lived off set pieces

Sweden's attacking geography tells its own story: 8 corners to Japan's 2, with 6 of their 11 attempts inside the box against 5 from range. Little of that came from clean positional play — the visitors mined restarts, rebounds and second balls, which is precisely how a team accumulates shots while its open-play xG stays anaemic at 0.64.

Japan's map was flatter: 4 attempts inside, 4 outside, 2 corners all night. Fewer shots, better shots — the whole match in miniature.

Four saves to two: the goalkeepers' unequal shifts

Sweden hit the target 5 times from 11 attempts, a sharper accuracy rate than Japan's 3 from 8. The workload followed: Japan's goalkeeper made 4 saves, Sweden's made 2, and both closed at +0.27 Goals Prevented — modestly above expectation, error-free.

The draw's fairest reading is mutual: Japan never converted its edge in chance quality, Sweden never created an edge of its own, and 1:1 is one of those rare scorelines both dressing rooms earned in equal measure.

Beyond the scoreline: the underlying data

The side with more of the ball was Japan (52% to 48%) — control of possession that didn't automatically translate into control of the scoreboard. Japan completed 445 passes at 84.9% accuracy, Sweden 395 at 79.0%; raw pass volume alone doesn't correlate with chance quality in this game.

Fouls read 20-11 (Japan-Sweden) — the side committing fewer of them generally gave up fewer dead-ball situations to defend. The offside count (3-2) is modest, but it tends to move with the number of balls played over the top rather than total attacking volume.

Corners went 2-8 to Sweden. Shots inside the box read 4 for Japan against 6 for Sweden, with 4 and 5 coming from outside it.

Blocked shots: 2 for Japan, 3 for Sweden — attempts that never reached the frame thanks to bodies in the way inside the box.

xG had Japan's chances valued at 1.21 and Sweden's at 0.64; the final score of 1-1 is a reminder that chance quality and finishing don't always move together.

The internal mismatch score here is 50/100, a measure of how statistically surprising the result was relative to both sides' xG.

A second pass at the numbers

Japan's profile in the report — 52% possession at 84.9% passing accuracy; 4 box shots and 4 from range produced 1.21 xG and 1 goal.

Sweden's profile in the report — 48% possession at 79.0% passing accuracy; 6 box shots and 5 from range produced 0.64 xG and 1 goal.

All figures above come from the official match report for Japan vs Sweden, with nothing estimated or rounded by eye.